Friday, February 5, 2016

Doctorow's Narration



              We've talked about how Doctorow interferes in the lives of his characters, and we've talked about how the omnipotent narrator of Ragtime is like a character in his own right. However, this varies a lot in different sections of the book.  In the first few chapters, the characters seem to be wholly under the control of the author. At first, they follow preset patterns, which fit expectations that we (the readers) may have. For example, we get the stereotypical nuclear family of Mother, Father, and the little boy, who all fulfill the traditional roles of a turn-of-the century family. The narrator chooses to go broad rather than deep, describing the world of the book from afar in order to give the readers the feeling of "this is what this era was like". After that, Doctorow zooms in a little further: he describes the lives of individuals briefly, before moving on to another person when they enter the story. It feels as if Doctorow is taking a video camera and filming a scene through the window of Tateh's apartment, and then briefly moving on to Jacob Riis, and Theodore Dreiser, and Stanford White/Harry Thaw. We don't get to see deeply into characters' heads at this point, which makes them feel more like Doctorow's puppets than actual people. Also, at the beginning there are some improbable coincidences (such as Houdini crashing in front of the family's house) that just serve as obvious excuses for Doctorow to do whatever he wants with his characters. 


                    As the book goes on, however, the characters develop more of a life of their own. In the beginning, Doctorow set up generalized depictions of various classes of American life. Now, the characters begin to display the free will necessary to break out of those molds. For example, after Father leaves for the Arctic Mother begins to resemble less and less the "ideal 1800s housewife" and more of her true personality shows through. Tateh becomes a more complex character than just the "struggling immigrant" type. Coalhouse Walker defies all expectations of "normal black behavior" when he begins killing firemen and setting fire to buildings in his quest for justice, while still maintaining his air of calm intelligence. Doctorow's narration reflects these changes: more time is spent inside the characters' heads and we can often forget the existence of the narrator. It becomes a story of people doing things, instead of a story of Doctorow telling us about people doing things. It stops jumping around as much, forming longer and more coherent threads. Arguably, Doctorow's use of irony becomes less frequent. It's still there, but only in little asides when there's a break in the action.


                  Interestingly, the very end of the book returns to the style of the beginning. The last chapter frustrated me at first because so many loose ends are conveniently wrapped up. After all of Younger Brother's character development, all we get is a brief section about him somehow traveling to Mexico and then dying, with almost no importance attached to his death. Father dies in a ridiculous coincidence involving the Lusitania, so Mother and Tateh can get married and live happily ever after. All of this is narrated in the same detached style as the beginning of the book, with no insight into the characters' heads. It's like the characters of Ragtime briefly developed lives of their own, and then faded back into the fictional realm they came from. Looking at it like this, it makes sense why Doctorow would add the quote, "...by that time the era of Ragtime had run out, with the heavy breath of the machine, as if history were no more than a tune on a player piano."

3 comments:

  1. I think this shifting narrative view provides a very interesting effect for the novel. I agree that the last chapter works well to have the characters fade back into history after their lives have been examined in detail. But initially I also thought that all of the main characters meeting up or dying cleaned up the story too conveniently. The story could have had them fade away without killing off half of them and setting up mother and Tateh in a "happily ever after" kind of marriage.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you point about the last chapter wrapping each of the stories up a little bit too nicely. I think I was most dismayed about how most of younger brother's character development seems to just be thrown away after his relationship with Coalhouse ends. He does retain his ideology of fighting for justice, but we don't get to see him think any more. In addition, the story goes through his travel so quickly. I feel like Doctorow could have maybe wrapped up the story better.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This "shifting" narrative style could be viewed as one subtle way that the novel foregrounds its own constructedness--not quite metafiction, but not trying to aim for a "transparent" representation of reality in the realist mode. There's this sense, from early in the novel, that the narrator/author takes some glee in his ability to do whatever he wants with the historical material (e.g. the gratuitous entry of Houdini into the family's story). By not aiming to create a thoroughly consistent narrative perspective with its own consistent set of rules, Doctorow is free to zoom in and zoom back out again. The stuff about what "we can't determine" about Coalhouse is especially cheeky in this regard--as if his own fictional creation were evading him, slipping through his fingers, reconstructed using scant historical evidence (when evidence isn't a problem *at all* when depicting J. P. Morgan and Ford).

    ReplyDelete