I was planning on writing a nice blog post about Catcher in the Rye, about Holden’s relationship with Allie or
something in that vein. But two days ago I picked up the graphic novel Fun Home by Alison Bechdel, and knew
within ten pages that I wanted to write about that. (This isn’t supposed to be
a review, but − read it. It’s amazing. I promise.)
For starters, Fun Home is very much a coming-of-age novel. It’s Bechdel’s memoir,
narrating her childhood and adolescence in rural Pennsylvania and her
experience coming out as a lesbian in college in the 1980s. However, it mainly
centers on her relationship with her father, a troubled and borderline-abusive English
teacher, funeral director, and obsessive aesthete. He dies in an accident when
Bechdel is 20, an incident that she believes (but can’t confirm) was suicide.
Around the same time, she discovers his lifelong secret – he’s had numerous
affairs with men and teenage boys, including her babysitter and several of his
students. These aren’t spoilers – Bechdel lays them out early on and spends the
rest of the book circling her and her father’s lives from different angles,
supplying new information each time.
Literature
is a central theme in Fun Home. Alison’s
father is an English teacher, and they bond over books. The novel contains
references to seemingly half the Western literary canon, ranging from Joyce to
Wilde to Camus to Wind in the Willows to
The Odyssey to Lord of the Rings. (My mom asked me if my 12-year-old brother would
like this book. His favorite series is Dragonball
Z, and this book is full of phrases like “his absence resonated
retroactively”.) This is a deliberate storytelling choice; Bechdel tells the
reader at one point, “I employ these allusions [...] not only as descriptive
devices, but because my parents are most real to me in fictional terms.” This
is the best way she knows to tell her story, because it’s the tradition she
grew up in. Most relevant to this class, though: there are many references to
books we’ve read in class this semester.
The most obvious parallel to a book
from our class comes from Catcher in the
Rye. As a high schooler, Alison ends up in her father’s English class, a
class called “Rites of Passage” (“Coming of Age Novel”, anyone?). They are
reading Catcher, and Alison’s father
asks the class who Mr. Antolini is. The class is silent, and he goes on to
explain that he’s Holden’s teacher, and he made a pass at him. Bechdel points
out, through her narration, that a) sitting in back of the class is a preternaturally
handsome football player who’s currently “helping my dad haul junk out of the
basement” (implied that’s not all
they’re doing), and b) Alison’s father has a “great capacity for cognitive
dissonance”. While I read Fun Home, I
drew the connection between Bruce Bechdel and Mr. Antolini, and was happy when
the book made that comparison as well.
In many ways, Alison Bechdel bears
a lot of similarity to Stephen Dedalus. In fact, she herself acknowledges this.
Alison and her father bond over Joyce, and he encourages her to read A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, saying,
“You damn well better identify with every page”. The very first chapter of the
novel is titled “Old Father, Old Artificer”. Fun Home
uses some of the same imagery that Portrait
does: the book opens with a young Alison playing airplane with her father,
a moment of “rare physical contact”. She likens this game to Dedalus and Icarus:
soaring in the air, held up by her father. Like Joyce in Portrait, she calls into question who is Dedalus and who is Icarus.
Her father’s craftsmanship and obsessive attention to detail seem to make him
the “old artificer”, but he is also the one who suffers the fall. Like Stephen,
Alison goes through artistic and sexual epiphanies over the course of the
story, culminating in a moment of metaphorical flight where she reconciles the
Dedalus/Icarus paradox, illustrated by a young Alison jumping into a pool and
her father’s waiting arms:
“What if Icarus hadn’t hurtled into
the sea? What if he’d inherited his father’s inventive bent? What might he have
wrought?” Implying, of course, that she is what Icarus could have been – a successful artist (in her case, cartoonist),
and, of course, alive.
“He did hurtle into the sea, of
course. But in the tricky reverse narration that impels our entwined stories,
he was there to catch me when I leapt.” No, her father is Icarus. Are they both Icarus, in their own way?
You're convincing me that _Fun Home_ needs to be on the syllabus for this course (if only I can find a spot to fit it in!), both as a remarkable coming-of-age narrative itself, but also in conversation with all these other books on our syllabus. I had remembered the connections to Joyce, but I'd forgotten about the Antolini exchange in class. Thanks for sharing. And this was one of the choices for the Sweet Sixteen library showdown? Go Bechdel!
ReplyDelete