Thursday, September 17, 2015

The Terrible Twosome



As I was reading Mrs. Dalloway, the portrayals of Holmes and Bradshaw stuck out in comparison to most of the other characters. For most of the book, Mrs. Dalloway doesn't seem to concern itself with large generalizations of "good" and "evil". The characters think contradicting thoughts, and it shows that the same person can have cruel impulses and kind ones, even at the same time, without their entire character being defined by them. Frequently, the book shows the same person through different points of view. For example, Clarissa is seen as an elitist snob by some and a lively, charming woman by others.  On the other hand, all of the major characters who interact with Bradshaw and/or Holmes (Septimus, Rezia, Clarissa, Richard) have the same opinion: they give them a deep sense of revulsion. In most cases, Woolf presents these different sides and allows you to draw your own conclusions about a character. I would argue that Holmes and Bradshaw are the embodiments of the bad side of human nature.
Even when Woolf is describing these characters, she doesn't narrate from their point of view - Bradshaw's life is told from a more detached narration style than we normally get, and Holmes is only described through Septimus's point of view. They both ascribe to a narrow view of what is "normal" and don't try to understand the thoughts and wishes of people who don't fit that mold, assuming they know what's best. Holmes dismisses Septimus's obvious PTSD as cowardice and basically tells him he just needs to get out more and get over himself. When Rezia and Septimus try to defy him, he doesn't listen. When Rezia tells him he's not welcome in their house, Dr. Holmes physically pushes her aside and goes on up to Septimus anyway. Dr. Bradshaw (thinks he) has a better grasp of psychology, but he treats Septimus's mental illness the same way that Holmes treats his physical illness: he makes automatic, one-size-fits-all assumptions and brushes the Smiths aside.
Although Holmes and Bradshaw are very different in terms of social status, knowledge, and mannerisms, I think they are meant to represent the same thing. When they appear in the book, they nearly always appear in tandem: Rezia goes to Holmes, and then goes to Bradshaw within two pages. Bradshaw is about to show up to take Septimus away, and then Holmes appears. Since they are such one-dimensional characters, they can almost seem more like embodiments of abstract concepts rather than people (which is very striking in contrast with all the other characters in the novel). They are the closest thing Mrs. Dalloway  has to villains. At one point, Septimus compares Holmes to human nature itself. Later on, when he is about to kill himself, he says something to the effect of, "Holmes and Bradshaw are upon me. Human nature is upon me." By "human nature", Woolf seems to mean the human tendency to want to be in control of a situation, to think that we know better than others. She could also mean more general human society, with its often-misguided opinions. Holmes and Bradshaw are in positions where they can exert their wills on other people, and they're obviously used to dismissing their patients as ignorant or too insane to know any better. 

3 comments:

  1. That's very interesting...I like how you pointed out the way Virginia Woolf has made the doctors more one dimensional than any other character. It's funny how, even in a book that's completely devoted to having complex and multidimensional characters, there's still a place for much simpler 'bad guys'. I also like the thought you had about how this simplicity could represent a more abstract concept than a single person. In that way, the fact that the doctors are universally disliked almost makes them more complex! The fact that everyone dislikes the doctors also hints at the connections between the otherwise disparite characters and reflects Woolf' own hatred of the treatments they perscribe, but this new perspective is geat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I especially like how you brought up the fact that Woolf never goes as far as to express the point of view of the doctors through free indirect discourse, but expresses them and their tendencies through the points of view of other characters. This is important because while it doesn't seem that they are major enough characters with respect to the novel as a whole, everyone still shares a similar feeling of grief and disdain towards them. Also, we can observe aspects of Holmes' and Bradshaw's attitude towards their patients here. They don't seem to genuinely care about what the patient is feeling; they don't try to communicate with the patient, but rather simply try to prescribe a solution to the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We discussed in class that Virginia Woolf herself suffered breakdowns and was subjected to the rest cure. It seems to me that this one- dimensional portrayal of Holmes and Bradshaw could be a result of prejudice arising from the experience. That said, I still agree with your idea of Holmes and Bradshaw representing concepts.

    ReplyDelete