As I was reading Mrs. Dalloway, the
portrayals of Holmes and Bradshaw stuck out in comparison to most of the other
characters. For most of the book, Mrs. Dalloway doesn't seem to concern
itself with large generalizations of "good" and "evil". The
characters think contradicting thoughts, and it shows that the same person can
have cruel impulses and kind ones, even at the same time, without their entire
character being defined by them. Frequently, the book shows the same person
through different points of view. For example, Clarissa is seen as an elitist
snob by some and a lively, charming woman by others. On the other hand, all of the major
characters who interact with Bradshaw and/or Holmes (Septimus, Rezia, Clarissa,
Richard) have the same opinion: they give them a deep sense of revulsion. In
most cases, Woolf presents these different sides and allows you to draw your
own conclusions about a character. I would argue that Holmes and Bradshaw
are the embodiments of the bad side of human nature.
Even when Woolf is describing these characters, she
doesn't narrate from their point of view - Bradshaw's life is told from a more
detached narration style than we normally get, and Holmes is only described through
Septimus's point of view. They both ascribe to a narrow view of what is
"normal" and don't try to understand the thoughts and wishes of
people who don't fit that mold, assuming they know what's best. Holmes
dismisses Septimus's obvious PTSD as cowardice and basically tells him he just
needs to get out more and get over himself. When Rezia and Septimus try to defy
him, he doesn't listen. When Rezia tells him he's not welcome in their house,
Dr. Holmes physically pushes her aside and goes on up to Septimus anyway. Dr.
Bradshaw (thinks he) has a better grasp of psychology, but he treats Septimus's
mental illness the same way that Holmes treats his physical illness: he makes
automatic, one-size-fits-all assumptions and brushes the Smiths aside.
Although Holmes and Bradshaw are very different in
terms of social status, knowledge, and mannerisms, I think they are meant to
represent the same thing. When they appear in the book, they nearly always
appear in tandem: Rezia goes to Holmes, and then goes to Bradshaw within two
pages. Bradshaw is about to show up to take Septimus away, and then Holmes
appears. Since they are such one-dimensional characters, they can almost seem
more like embodiments of abstract concepts rather than people (which is very
striking in contrast with all the other characters in the novel). They are the
closest thing Mrs. Dalloway has to villains. At one point, Septimus
compares Holmes to human nature itself. Later on, when he is about to kill
himself, he says something to the effect of, "Holmes and Bradshaw are upon
me. Human nature is upon me." By "human nature", Woolf seems to
mean the human tendency to want to be in control of a situation, to think that
we know better than others. She could also mean more general human society,
with its often-misguided opinions. Holmes and Bradshaw are in positions where they can exert their wills on other people, and they're obviously used to dismissing their patients as ignorant or too insane to know any better.
That's very interesting...I like how you pointed out the way Virginia Woolf has made the doctors more one dimensional than any other character. It's funny how, even in a book that's completely devoted to having complex and multidimensional characters, there's still a place for much simpler 'bad guys'. I also like the thought you had about how this simplicity could represent a more abstract concept than a single person. In that way, the fact that the doctors are universally disliked almost makes them more complex! The fact that everyone dislikes the doctors also hints at the connections between the otherwise disparite characters and reflects Woolf' own hatred of the treatments they perscribe, but this new perspective is geat.
ReplyDeleteI especially like how you brought up the fact that Woolf never goes as far as to express the point of view of the doctors through free indirect discourse, but expresses them and their tendencies through the points of view of other characters. This is important because while it doesn't seem that they are major enough characters with respect to the novel as a whole, everyone still shares a similar feeling of grief and disdain towards them. Also, we can observe aspects of Holmes' and Bradshaw's attitude towards their patients here. They don't seem to genuinely care about what the patient is feeling; they don't try to communicate with the patient, but rather simply try to prescribe a solution to the problem.
ReplyDeleteWe discussed in class that Virginia Woolf herself suffered breakdowns and was subjected to the rest cure. It seems to me that this one- dimensional portrayal of Holmes and Bradshaw could be a result of prejudice arising from the experience. That said, I still agree with your idea of Holmes and Bradshaw representing concepts.
ReplyDelete